Skip to content
AssureLens - Agentic AI for Energy
10Planworkflows9Governworkflows9Executeworkflows6ReviewworkflowsUse-case library36 workflows · 7 teamsAll phasesSearch use cases…Offset-well risk reviewDrilling · Risk AnalysisPlanPlanning risk registerAssurance · Risk AnalysisGovernMitigation action ownershipOperations · Action TrackingExecuteView all 36 use casesStart with one bounded workflowRepresentative records and availablereviewers make the best first use case.

Oil & gas use-case library

Start with the use cases that drive real impact.

Explore 36 workflows across drilling, well delivery, supplier management, cost oversight and specialist review. Data connections and implementation scope are agreed for each engagement.

36 of 36 use cases

PlanDrilling

Offset-well risk review

Bring relevant events and mitigations from selected offset reports into the next risk review.

InOffset DDRs, programmes and expert context
OutA source-linked set of risks for applicability review
Risk Analysis
PlanDrilling

Planning workshop preparation

Prepare evidence and discussion topics before a multidisciplinary planning session.

InProgrammes, offset findings and workshop objectives
OutA structured agenda and reviewed planning inputs
Project Planning
PlanDrilling

Workshop decision capture

Retain the reasoning, decisions and follow-up agreed by workshop participants.

InWorkshop notes and accepted findings
OutDecisions linked to owners and source evidence
Project Planning
PlanDrilling

Historical lesson retrieval

Find lessons from previous wells and preserve their origin when bringing them into a new project.

InAuthorised historical insight registers
OutSelected lessons with their source well and review state
AI Insights
PlanIT & digital

Operational document search

Locate supporting evidence across a selected collection of well records.

InIndexed project documents and user questions
OutRelevant passages and source references
AI Insights
PlanDrilling

AI draft insight review

Review AI-generated risks, opportunities, concerns and best practices before publication.

InSelected reports and generated draft findings
OutAn accepted or rejected set with review rationale
AI Insights
PlanDrilling

New-well review without offsets

Analyse planning documents even when there is no suitable historical comparison.

InTarget-well programme and technical records
OutDraft findings with no invented historical precedent
AI Insights
PlanOperations

Seven-day activity lookahead

Connect upcoming activities with relevant findings and preparation requirements.

InWork breakdown, accepted DDRs and offset risks
OutA forward activity view with mapped risks
Lookahead Planning
PlanOperations

Plan-versus-actual review

Compare reported activity and progress with the original well-plan baseline.

InLocked plan baseline and daily drilling reports
OutDeviation findings for operational review
Lookahead Planning
PlanOperations

Missing DDR identification

Make gaps in the daily-report sequence visible before interpreting an updated view.

InExpected reporting days and uploaded DDRs
OutA record-completeness queue
Lookahead Planning
GovernAssurance

Planning risk register

Turn finalised findings into a structured planning risk register.

InAccepted findings and project risk criteria
OutRisk scores, controls and mitigation ownership
Risk Analysis
GovernAssurance

Residual-risk review

Review whether proposed controls change the assessed risk.

InInherent assessment and control evidence
OutAn expert-reviewed residual assessment
Risk Analysis
GovernProcurement

Contractor pre-qualification

Organise qualification evidence around agreed technical and assurance requirements.

InTechnical submissions, certificates and track records
OutEvidence gaps and a reviewed qualification summary
Due Diligence
GovernProcurement

Vendor evidence-gap review

Surface missing or inconsistent information before completing vendor review.

InVendor submission packs and required evidence list
OutClarification requests and review status
Due Diligence
GovernProcurement

RFP proposal comparison

Compare supplier proposals against consistent technical, commercial, HSE and delivery criteria.

InProposals and agreed evaluation criteria
OutA structured comparison for the selection team
Supplier Excellence
GovernProcurement

Contract-gap analysis

Identify contract terms that need review against project requirements.

InContracts and approved operator requirements
OutA reviewer-owned gap and clarification register
Supplier Excellence
GovernProcurement

Supplier performance review

Bring delivery, quality, cost and risk evidence together for supplier discussions.

InService records, KPIs and contract commitments
OutA performance scorecard and improvement actions
Supplier Excellence
GovernProcurement

Contract variation review

Review the scope and commercial implications of proposed supplier changes.

InVariation requests, baseline scope and cost evidence
OutAn impact summary for authorised approval
Supplier Excellence
GovernProcurement

End-of-contract learning

Capture supplier performance and lessons for subsequent engagements.

InReview history, commitments and close-out records
OutA close-out assessment and reusable lessons
Supplier Excellence
ExecuteOperations

Mitigation action ownership

Assign responsibility and due dates to actions arising from reviewed risks.

InAccepted risks and agreed mitigations
OutAn owned action register
Action Tracking
ExecuteOperations

Overdue-action follow-up

Make unresolved commitments visible to the people accountable for delivery.

InTask owners, dates and status records
OutA prioritised follow-up view
Action Tracking
ExecuteAssurance

Closure evidence capture

Preserve the evidence supporting task completion for later review.

InCompleted tasks and supporting records
OutA traceable closure history
Action Tracking
ExecuteAssurance

Barrier evidence review

Organise barrier and test documentation for qualified integrity review.

InBarrier records and test evidence
OutEvidence gaps and specialist review actions
Well Integrity
ExecuteAssurance

Pressure exception review

Bring selected pressure observations into an exception-review workflow.

InAgreed observations and review criteria
OutFlagged observations for specialist assessment
Well Integrity
ExecuteFinance

AFE estimate review

Review estimate line items and assumptions against relevant historical evidence.

InAFE estimates and approved cost comparisons
OutCost items requiring investigation
AFE Intelligence
ExecuteFinance

AFE revision and drift review

Track changes between estimate revisions and identify unexplained increases.

InAFE revisions and scope-change records
OutA variance view with investigation notes
AFE Intelligence
ExecuteFinance

Invoice-to-AFE reconciliation

Compare invoice evidence with cost items and flag possible mismatches.

InInvoices, AFE lines and contract context
OutA billing exception review queue
AFE Intelligence
ExecuteFinance

Portfolio cost oversight

Compare estimate and cost trends across selected wells and operators.

InConsistent AFE and actual-cost records
OutPortfolio comparisons for cost review
AFE Intelligence
ReviewLeadership

Portfolio performance review

Bring well phases, performance and unresolved work into a shared overview.

InAgreed project metrics and review states
OutA portfolio view with drill-down context
KPI & Dashboard
ReviewLeadership

KPI and action reporting

Connect indicator changes with project actions and supporting records.

InDefined measures, actions and operational sources
OutA reviewed performance summary
KPI & Dashboard
ReviewDrilling

Offset-well benchmarking

Compare selected wells using consistent measures and operating context.

InPeer wells, definitions and contextual exclusions
OutComparable performance views and candidate targets
Benchmarking
ReviewDrilling

Section-duration comparison

Investigate differences in section duration before setting a planning target.

InSection records and comparable well context
OutA contextualised duration comparison
Benchmarking
ReviewOperations

After-action review

Capture what happened, why it happened and what the next team should learn.

InOperational outcomes and participant judgments
OutReviewed lessons with applicability notes
AAR & End of Well Report
ReviewOperations

End-of-well report drafting

Prepare a source-grounded narrative from the operational record.

InDDRs, outcomes, decisions and review notes
OutA report draft for expert approval
AAR & End of Well Report
Across the lifecycleAssurance

Specialist finding validation

Bring appropriate domain expertise to findings that need specialist context.

InDefined review question and authorised evidence
OutReviewed findings and recorded recommendations
Expert Hub
Across the lifecycleLeadership

Expert work-package assignment

Define a specialist assignment with clear scope, access and deliverables.

InProject brief and expertise requirements
OutAn agreed engagement and reviewed deliverable
Expert Hub
Start a conversation

Which workflow should we improve first?

Bring a planning challenge, a set of operational records or a recurring review task.